As with much of writing in The Rescen Papers (trp), this is not a finished, polished academic text, but neither is it merely a diarist's attempt to look at the creative process. As a Research Associate at Rescen, Richard has been looking at ways in which he can write about specific issues of the making process...

 

Richard Layzell’s Leaning Post

I've been avoiding looking into process because most of the things I'm working on just now aren't particularly time-based. Will the processes revealed be similar to those in a live piece? The time has come. I've used footnotes to broaden the content.

 

xxxxxxxx

The Leaning Post has gradually evolved over several months. It's one of the outcomes of Immersion, a research project funded by the Arts Council. It has a particular function and is also specifically aesthetic. The padded seat is covered with black imitation leather fabric 1 duplicating in colour and texture the wide strips of elastic webbing which support our body weight as we lean into it. It sits quietly until activated by a body, with brightly coloured sides and vertical strips of black webbing.

It began as an idea stemming from later versions of Tap Ruffle and Shave in Manchester and Newcastle 2, when objects like the rocker and the celestial chamber started to appear - structures to lie on or crawl inside, a total physical involvement. Or maybe it came from my collaborator Jens Johnson, who suggested a coffee bar environment where visitors are forced to lean and stretch in unusual positions through the outlandish angles of their seating, with small tables attached where they can rest their cups. This remains an interesting idea, placing cafe culture within an art context - the coffee sipping stretching sprawling installation within an art museum.

This was always a prototype, trial and error, knocking things up in the studio 3. First stage was making drawings; second stage was constructing maquettes; third stage was deciding to actually build one; fourth stage was sourcing the wide elasticised webbing in John Lewis 4 and buying a whole roll of it 4 inches wide, the widest available. Fifth stage was building the 'leaning' framework and stretching the elastic across it. Trial and error here, not tight enough at first, causing the body weight to lean back too far into the timber framework behind. After re-stretching considerably tighter, using as much grip and stretching power as I could muster, the body weight was well held, but the timber frame began to noticeably how, against the pressure of the elastic. To rectify this the design had to be modified with the addition of a second length of 2-inch by 2-inch timber bolted against the length of the stretched frame. This created sufficient straightening as to be visually acceptable; the bowing wasn't obvious any longer. It also added strength, given the users' body weight.

The crucial stage came in designing the platform, the place where the user stands.

Trial and error led to the idea of including it, so that this step for our feet actually throws us back into the elastic. We have no choice. We are forced to lean, to he. It worked It was comfortable and a physical involvement with the object that was neither sitting or Iying down, couch or bed-like. We're leaning. We're aware of our body weight. We could be sipping tea alongside another body. Is this an art experience?

With the conviction that the idea worked and could be built, there was now an extensive stage of modification which lasted several months, while other projects and deadlines took precedence. I used some spare MDF to create the 'lean' and decided, that it should be dismantlable, for transportation and convenience. It should virtually pack flat .The one issue about the prototype that disappointed me was that a significant amount of the body weight was forced onto the feet. A way around this was to create some kind of ledge for the bottom to rest on, taking a proportion of the weight and probably creating a more restful state. I was troubled by this and wanted to experiment. But the existing 'lean' was already constructed and was successful enough. Maybe I could combine the two ideas m one structure, back to back. The MDF for the sides was already cut, and within these confines I decided to give it a go 7. I began to construct a second 'lean', with a padded ledge, behind the first. This is where the black fabric (see footnote 1) came in.

There was compromise in this construction, caused by the space limitations of the MDF sides, and when it was finally completed the angle of this second 'lean' was too steep. The person leaning was thrown slightly forward. It wasn't possible to modify this angle for lack of space at the top. But this was a prototype after all It would make sense to test it out and get feedback on its fucntionfunction and aesthetics. Too steep or not was beside the point until it was tried and tested Jens Johannsen tried it out and threw himself forward into it, rather than leaning back I hadn't thought of this. Would other people go for the forward hinge? Or was this typical of his bodily fluidity as an exponent of Body Mind Centring?

I became aware of an overlap with my role at AIT Ltd. and thought about taking it into the office for testing, getting it out of the art context altogether. The Leaning Post could have a de-stressing function in the workplace.

This decision forced completion of the prototype and brought it up to a level of finish that I hadn't originally planned for. Setting a date to install it created that familiar pressure of a deadline. I repainted it, tidied up the elastic, dismantled it and reassembled it as a test of the procedure that was to come. I marked how the pieces fit together.

I transported and installed it on January 18th 2000. I expect it to stay in the Holdsworth Building for three or four months. On the day it appeared I sent out a company-wide e-mail explaining its presence and purpose, inviting people to have a lean and let me know how they found it. Their feedback, and mine about it being there, has so far been favourable. People are surprised I actually built this object myself 9. They like the workmanship, its fetishistic qualities and its function. They try it out. They are surprised it can take their weight. They are amused by it. I like it there, in its corporate surroundings. It doesn't look out of place.

 

materials used: Softwood, MDF, plywood, elastic webbing, fabric, rubber matting, foam, red, blue and black emulsion paint, filler, textured floor matting, coach bolts, washers, nuts, screws, nails, staples.

tools used: Electric drill, saw, hammer, clamp, sash c/amp, countersink bit, screwdriver, stapler, expanding rule, straight edge, spanner, spatula, PVA glue, scissors, knife, pencil. duration from conception to construction to installation: Jan 99 to Jan 00

 

Notes:

1 This fabric that came from the surplus 'Fabric Store' in Stroud Green Road and that I first used for the padded ceiling of the Celestial Chamber for the Science Museum in 1997.

2 The interactive installation Tap Ruffle and Shave was commissioned by Glasgow Museums in 1995. It was substantially re-worked when shown at the South Bank Centre in 1996. Thereafter, at the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester in 1997 and the Laing Art Gallery in Newcastle in 1998,I used it as an opportunity to prototype new ideas, with a view to the next installation project.

3 Studio 29 Chisenhale Studios, a former Spitfire propeller factory, next to Chisenhale Dance Space in Bethnal Green

4 On this occasion, in John Lewis in Oxford Street, I also explored another element of the Immersion research - I travelled up and down in the lifts repeatedly, recording my impressions of this physical experience on a dictaphone:

Changing Perception 14th Jan. 1999.

Going up and down in the lift at John Lewis at the moment.

"Not pressing any buttons, just seeing what happens

Lot of bing-ing going on, Basement coming.

Back in the lift now.

Bing!

Hit the Basement and the 5th Floor, going between the two.

Feel more like a member of staff, different perception.

More relaxed in the lift, less of a rush.

Going up to the 5th floor again.

Shopping as art, kind of an art form, looking for materials through shopping.

Flashes of light through the windows as we go from floor to floor.

Starting to feel suspicious now.

Bing. Bing "

Having also spent the morning in a similar perceptual/behavioural state in Victoria Park, Hackney, again using the dictaphone.

5 This question is frequently around in my psyche. Seeing a group of people Iying on their backs on soft fabrics watching silk curtains blowing in a fluctuating breeze emanating from column fans, as a new element in Tap, Ruffle and Shave, I ask this question At a crossroads in Minsk city centre moving my arms slowly and deliberately, shifting my weight purposefully, exaggeratedly, slowing when someone notices, just stepping over into "performed" behaviour, I ask this question, knowing full well that you can’t make anti-art. But it still makes you wonder when the accusation is made.

6 Medium density fibreboard

7 Developing the second side of the Leaning Post was a long and complicated process, frustrating because it was clear fairly early on that it wasn't going to fucntion as well as the first side often found that the ‘modification' stage of a project, work or performance is the hardest and most taxing.

8 A software developer in Henley-on-Thames with a staff of 250. My role as artist-in-residence has evolved since 1995. I have input into the culture and the physical environment, including a new building complex, which is now in its second phase The Leaning Post would sit most comfortably in the foyer of one of these buildings, the Holdsworth building My desk is on the first floor.

9 I rarely bring in examples of my own work, acting more as a designer and instigator, by bringing in other artists and performers